Overview / Executive dashboard
Daikin Sricity
Unified Workforce Governance. Defensible Audit Readiness.
Synthesize live signals across talent acquisition, contractor compliance, and OHS into a singular statutory posture rollup. Instantly drill into any risk vector to verify the unbroken, cryptographically traceable evidence chain.
Compliance score
72/100
▲ 4 vs last quarter
Estimated exposure
₹1.4Cr
range ₹0.8 – ₹2.3 Cr
Onboarding throughput
142/wk
▲ 18% contract intensity rising
Open contractor gaps
23
▼ 5 4 critical · 19 advisory
Module health
Live status of the five vertical modules and supporting engines
| Module | Status | Open items | SLA breaches | Posture |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talent Acquisition & Progression 14 open Position IDs |
Healthy | 14 | 2 | |
| Onboarding 9 in document verification |
Attention | 9 | 3 | |
| Vendor compliance Compressor Line · ESIC mismatch |
Critical | 23 | 7 | |
| Workplace Safety & OHS Analytics 2 near-miss in Paint Shop · same shift |
Watch pattern | 2 | 0 | |
| Compliance umbrella 90-day roadmap · 14/22 milestones |
On track | 8 | 1 |
90-day remediation roadmap
Sequenced milestones from the statutory posture rollup · Andhra Pradesh
Weeks 1–4 Foundations
ESIC enrolment SLA tightened to 3 days. Standing orders refreshed. Appointment letters universal.
Weeks 5–8 Contractor cleanup
Licence renewals · ESIC challan reconciliation · joint liability quantification · contractor portal go-live.
Weeks 9–13 Audit-ready
Inspector visit simulator drills. BRSR P5 aggregation. Wage definition under s.2(y) Code on Wages reviewed.
Posture by domain
Weighted by enforcement frequency
72
posture
Wages & benefits
81
OHS & factories
76
Industrial relations
70
Contractor & CLRA
54
Largest financial exposure: wage definition restructuring under s.2(y) Code on Wages — basic ≥ 50% of total wages — pending notification in AP. Estimated impact range ₹40–90 L on PF, gratuity and leave encashment provisions.
Recent activity
Cryptographically chained audit events
14:02:11 · today
Safety briefing dispatched · 4 languages
2,087 workers · WA + PA + notice board · MSG-87412
a3f7…d290
11:47:02 · today
Contractor licence expiring · Sri Lakshmi Engg
CLRA renewal due in 21 days · routed to contractor portal
b9e1…44ac
09:18:55 · today
Rule bundle v2026.05.2 activated
Approved by Customer IT Admin · Rakesh K · adds AP gazette of 12 May
7c22…1f08
17:42:30 · yesterday
ESIC mismatch · Compressor Line
142 deployed · 138 on May challan · 4-worker shortfall flagged
10ed…ab44
Overview / Labour Code Readiness Survey
SME Pulse Survey 2026 · anonymous · under 5 minutes
What does compliance actually cost your organisation?
India's 4 Labour Codes came into force on 21 November 2025. This 9-question pulse survey maps how manufacturing, construction and logistics organisations are responding — and returns a scored readiness benchmark against sector peers, a prioritised gap report and a peer penalty-exposure profile. No company names. No sales call.
Progress
0/9
questions answered
★
What you get in return — instantly
On completion you see your organisation benchmarked against sector peers — readiness score, top compliance gaps by code, and the estimated penalty-exposure profile for your workforce size.
Sector benchmark
Gap heatmap
Peer penalty exposure
Priority action list
A
Your organisation's profile
Shapes which compliance obligations apply — used only for benchmarking
Q1. Which sector best describes your primary operations?
If you span multiple sectors, choose where the majority of your workforce is deployed.
ManufacturingSteel, auto, pharma, textiles, FMCG
Construction & infrastructureEPC, real estate, roads, power
Logistics & warehousing3PL, transport, cold chain
Mining & natural resourcesCoal, quarrying, O&G
Engineering servicesHeavy fabrication, project services
Other non-IT sectorUtilities, trade, healthcare
Please select your sector to continue.
Q2. Total workforce size — direct employees + contract workers combined
Approximate is fine. This determines which Labour Code thresholds apply to you.
Under 50
50 – 99
100 – 299
300 – 999
1,000 – 4,999
5,000 +
Please select your workforce size.
Q3. What proportion of your workforce are contract workers engaged through third-party contractors?
None — direct employees only
Under 25% contract workers
25% – 50% contract workers
More than 50% contract workers
Please select your contractor proportion.
B
Compliance reality — where you actually are
No right or wrong answers. Honest responses produce the most useful benchmark.
Why this matters. In preliminary conversations across 40 manufacturing organisations, less than 1 in 5 had verified their contractors' ESIC challan coverage in the last 30 days — yet principal-employer liability for this gap is immediate under the new Social Security Code.
Q4. How confident are you that all your contract workers are correctly enrolled in EPFO and ESIC — including those engaged through sub-contractors?
Rate your actual confidence, not your aspirational position.
No visibility at allFully verified monthly
Please rate your confidence level.
Q5. Which compliance activities do you currently perform manually — without a dedicated system or tool? Select all that apply.
Manual = spreadsheets, email, physical registers, or direct portal logins.
EPFO challan verification
ESIC coverage tracking
Contractor licence monitoring
Minimum wage compliance check
Compliance calendar / due dates
Muster roll reconciliation
State gazette monitoring
Inspection readiness documentation
Standing orders management
Please select at least one area.
Q6. In the last 12 months, what was your most significant consequence from a labour compliance gap?
This is the data point most useful to the sector. Answers are fully anonymised and aggregated.
No significant consequence — fully compliant
Show-cause notice or inspection letter receivedFrom labour department, EPFO, ESIC, or factory inspector
Financial penalty or interest chargedCompounding demand, short-remittance penalty, or damages
Worker dispute or IR complaint filedRelated to wages, benefits, or contract terms
Lost a tender or contract due to a compliance certificateGovernment or large-client procurement requirement
Other consequence
Please select one option.
C
Decision-making & tools
Understanding how compliance decisions actually get made in your organisation
Q7. When a plant or site manager needs to hire additional workers — permanent, contract or fixed-term — how is the compliance impact of that decision evaluated?
It usually isn't — compliance is checked after the hireReactive review once workers are already deployed
HR or compliance team is consulted — informallyPhone call or email, no structured process
Structured process — approval workflow with compliance checkFormal gate before the hiring decision is made
System-driven — our platform flags compliance implications automaticallyIntegrated with HRMS or workforce management tool
Please select one option.
Q8. In your own words — what is the single biggest compliance headache your team is carrying right now? Optional
The most valuable input in the survey. Even one sentence helps — read by the research team, not a sales algorithm.
Q9. Has your organisation assessed its obligations under the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act 2023 in relation to your worker data?
Worker names, Aadhaar numbers, UAN, ESIC IDs, wage data and biometric attendance records are all personal data under DPDP Act 2023. Maximum breach penalty: ₹250 crore.
Yes — we have a formal DPDP assessment underway or completeDPA signed with vendors, consent process documented
Aware of it — but no formal assessment yetWe know it applies; haven't actioned it
Partially — IT/legal has looked at it but worker data isn't mappedDPDP assessed for customer data, not worker data
Not aware this applies to usFirst time hearing that worker data is covered
Please select one option.
Privacy commitment. This survey collects no name, email or company name. Responses are stored in aggregated, anonymised form. The benchmark is computed entirely in your browser from sector-level aggregates.
Overview / Architectural Blueprint
Hybrid tenancy · §3 of PRD
Architectural blueprint — shared intelligence, private data
Multi-tenant assessment engine on Karya Vaani cloud. Single-tenant remediation deployed inside your perimeter. Cross-boundary flow is signed bundles down, aggregate signals up — never raw PII.
Karya Vaani SaaS · multi-tenant · India region
Assessment intelligence · vendor-managed · continuous delivery
⌖Continuous Compliance Engine
7-question rubric · sector schedules · always-on
⌒Rule library
Statutory · signed · versioned
⍟Gazette monitor
NLP scan · central + state
⊟Benchmarking
Anonymised · opt-in
↓ Signed rule bundles · ↑ Aggregate signals only · no PII ↓
Customer remediation platform · single-tenant · Daikin Sricity
Worker PII · document store · audit trail · versioned releases via change management
Talent Acquisition & Progression
Position IDs · SLAs · ladder
Onboarding
Direct + contract tracks
Vendor compliance
Contractor self-serve · ESIC
Workplace Safety & OHS Analytics
Incidents · CAPA · presence × pattern × time
Compliance umbrella
Score · exposure · roadmap
VAANI translation
Sarvam Mayura + Bulbul v3
Knowledge Center
RAG assistant · learning · OHS · role qualifications
Broadcasting
WhatsApp + PA + PDF · yuniTalk
⌗ Append-only audit trail
SHA-256 chained · WORM · statutory retention
🎌 Global Localization Engine
Japanese + multi-lingual · approval gate
↓ Event-driven API handoff · HMAC-SHA256 + mTLS · idempotent ↓
Customer enterprise IT — Daikin systems of record
Karya Vaani's responsibility for intake formally ends here
HRIS
Workday / SAP / Darwinbox
EHS system
Incident webhooks
Payroll
Master record + statutory IDs
IdP (SSO)
SAML 2.0 / OIDC + MFA
Operational Pillars / Karya Nirṇay decision builder
Guided builder · 4 Labour Codes · 5 workforce structures
Structure the hire before it becomes a liability
Define a workforce requirement, layer the business constraints, and the engine maps it against the Code on Wages, Industrial Relations, Social Security and OSHC codes — surfacing threshold crossings and recommending the commercially optimal, compliant structure.
Role & volume
Drives threshold checks at 10 · 20 · 100 · 300 worker marks
Plant context
State rules & gazette wages applied to the scenario
State-specific minimum wages & gazette rules applied
Current plant workforce
Used to calculate threshold crossings and contractor-ratio limits
Operational constraints
Work nature — select all that apply
Safety-critical process
Demand fluctuates
Seasonal peak only
Core process — must retain
Proprietary / IP risk
Cost reduction pressure
Evaluate for permanent hire
How this is used. These constraints layer over the statutory rules — the engine balances commercial fit against compliance exposure to pick the optimal structure.
Compliance impact analysis
All 4 Labour Codes checked — threshold crossings, liability triggers and state obligations surfaced
Recommendation
Workforce decision
Workforce composition after hire
Operational Pillars / Talent Acquisition & Progression
Module 1 · success factors · Position IDs · SLAs · progress ladders
Track every Position ID through the progression ladder
Each requisition gets a persistent Position ID with explicit success factors, SLAs and an inspectable progress ladder. Stages, breach reasons, hiring manager and recruiter ownership are captured at every step and rolled up by function, location and recruiter.
Open positions
14
Plant floor 5 · Engg 2 · Other 7
Avg time to fill
38d
▼ 6d vs target 45d
Offer acceptance
82%
last 90 days
SLA breaches
2
Sourcing · Screening
—
—
Open requisitions
Click any row to inspect · click any stage to jump to that step in the ladder
✕
Sorted by Days open · desc
Reset
| Position ID↕ | Role↕ | Function↕ | Stage↕ | Days open↕ | SLA↕ |
|---|
Operational Pillars / Onboarding
Module 2 · single worker entity, two tracks
Verify, induct, attest — differently for direct vs. contract
Single worker entity with a worker_type discriminator. Direct employees and contract workers share a document store and audit trail; statutory requirements diverge where they must.
Verified
—
— of all checks
Pending
—
— self-attest · — digital · — ESIC
Action required
—
—
Workers in onboarding
——
— blocked from push to HRIS
Digital evidence vs self-attest
——
—
Verification breakdown
by track & type
Done
Pending
Rejected
Direct employee track
Contract worker track
Shared document store
In-progress · direct employees
Click a worker to inspect verification ledger — self-attested docs and digitally-verified evidence
9 active
| Worker↕ | Position ID↕ | Role↕ | Stage↕ | Verification↕ | PPE / Size↕ | Induction↕ | Days↕ |
|---|
Direct employee checklist
Offer letter linked to Position IDauto
Aadhaar (eKYC where applicable)auto
PAN + bank proofauto
UAN portability check (EPFO)read-only
Education + prior employmentmanual
Standing-order acknowledgementauto
Code of conduct sign-offauto
Native-language welcome (WA)VAANI
On completion
Worker record pushes to Daikin HRIS via API handoff. Karya Vaani continues tracking in OHS and Compliance; master record now owned by HRIS.
Operational Pillars / Induction training
Module 3 · induction · PPE issuance + statutory briefings
Get every joinee floor-ready in 4 days
Tracks PPE/uniform sizing, fitment readiness and induction completion for both direct employees and contract workers. Safety briefings under Factories Act s.41-B and Schedule 21 cannot be marked complete without PPE issued.
In flight
—
workers in induction
Completion rate
—%
—
Avg days to complete
—d
target ≤ 4d
At risk
—
—
Induction tracks
Four tracks · every worker takes Common + one of Direct/Contract + their Role-specific module
Common · all workers
Plant orientation
Site rules, emergency map, evacuation, basic Hindi/Telugu/Tamil safety phrases.
Site rules
Evacuation
Emergency contacts
Direct employees
Code & HR policies
Code of conduct, IESO standing orders, leave, attendance, HRMS walkthrough.
Code of conduct
Standing orders
HRMS · LMS
Leave & attendance
Contract workers
Contractor-specific
CLRA worker rights, ESIC card use, wage register, contractor portal, native-language safety.
CLRA rights
ESIC card use
Wage register
Role-specific
Safety competency
Per-role safety briefing — varies by zone (compressor line, paint shop, logistics, tool-room, etc).
Zone PPE drill
Machine-specific lockout
Chemical handling
Confined-space (where applicable)
Joinees · induction progress
Direct + contract · click a worker for the full ledger · click a chip above to filter · sort by Language to group workers by induction language
✕
Sorted by Risk · desc
Reset
| Worker↕ | Type↕ | Position / Contractor↕ | Join date↕ | Language↕ | PPE / Uniform↕ | Induction progress↕ | Status↕ | Risk↕ |
|---|
Induction ledger
—
Close ✕
Operational Pillars / Vendor compliance
Module 4 · principal employer exposure
Real-time view on contractor compliance
Contractors register through a self-service portal; the principal employer (you) approves and gets a live compliance score, ESIC/PF reconciliation against deployment, and quantified joint-liability exposure.
Active contractors
7
1,400 deployed workers
Licences expiring < 30d
2
Sri Lakshmi · Coastal
ESIC mismatches
1
Sri Lakshmi · May
Joint-liability exposure
—
mid case · sums by contractor
Contractor master
Self-service portal with principal employer approval gates · click a row to drill into compliance, tasks & liability exposure
✕
Sorted by Joint liability · desc
Reset
| Contractor↕ | Deployed↕ | Score↕ | CLRA licence↕ | ESIC reconcile↕ | PF reconcile↕ | Joint liability↕ | Open tasks↕ |
|---|
Contractor compliance · drill-down
—
—
SCORE
Close ✕
Overview
Workers deployed
Open tasks
Liability exposure
Documents
Communications
Open contractor tasks · all contractors
Tasks aggregated across contractors · click a contractor row above to filter
Joint-liability exposure · principal employer
SS Code s.67 (pending notification in AP) exposes principal employer to contractor PF/ESIC failure. Mid-case exposure is the sum of all contractor exposures plus a fixed disruption + customer audit overhead.
Operational Pillars / Workplace Safety & OHS Analytics
Module 5 · presence × pattern × time · incident ledger
Patterns are louder than incidents
Single safety ledger for incidents, near-misses and observations, cross-referenced with employee and contractor presence and time tracking. Same-zone, same-shift, same-contractor clusters surface as patterns and drive zone-specific refresher routing.
LTIFR (12 mo rolling)
0.42
▲ seasonal uplift
Near-misses · 30d
17
Paint Shop heaviest
Open CAPAs
9
2 overdue
PPE compliance (obs.)
91%
Helmet 96% · shoes 97% · ear 78%
Incident ledger · last 30 days
19 entries| ID | Type | Zone | Worker | Shift | CAPA | Statutory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OHS-1148 | Near-miss | Paint Shop · Zone 3 | Contract · Sri Lakshmi | B (14:00) | Open · 4d | — |
| OHS-1147 | Near-miss | Paint Shop · Zone 3 | Contract · Sri Lakshmi | B (16:30) | Open · 6d | — |
| OHS-1145 | Observation | Compressor Line | Direct | A | Closed | — |
| OHS-1142 | Injury (minor) | Packaging | Contract · Pavan | C | Closed | Form 21 · filed 24h |
| OHS-1138 | Property damage | Warehouse | Contract · Bharat | A | Open · 8d | — |
CAPA closure tracking
9 openOwners assigned9 / 9
On-time (SLA 14 days)7 / 9
Closure evidence pending2
Escalations to EHS lead2
Patterns detected
Same-zone repeat: 4 near-misses in Paint Shop Zone 3 within 11 days. Routed to LMS for zone-specific refresher; Broadcasting cued to fire safety alert in TE/HI/EN.
Same-contractor cluster: 6 of 17 incidents in 30d involve Sri Lakshmi Engg workers (35% vs 11% headcount share). Contractor compliance score already flagged amber.
Time-of-day correlation: 11 of 17 near-misses cluster in the 13:00–16:00 post-meal window. Recommends supervisor briefing + ventilation check.
Statutory reporting
Form 21 (Factories Act)1 filed · 24h
OSH&WC equivalentnot yet notified · AP
ESIC Form 161 filed · 7d
Operational Pillars / Statutory posture
Module 6 · umbrella · assessment → dashboard
Posture, exposure, and a sequenced roadmap
Rolls up signals from the four operational modules plus standalone statutory tracks. Every recommendation tagged with the applicable regime by state and a last-verified date.
Statutory coverage
Tracked acts & codes · regime status disclosed per state
| Regime | Andhra Pradesh | Tamil Nadu | Gujarat |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSH & Working Conditions | Factories Act 1948 | Factories Act 1948 | OSHC partial |
| Industrial Relations | IDA 1947 + IESO 1946 | IDA 1947 | IDA 1947 |
| Wages | MW Act + PoW Act | MW Act + PoW Act | Code on Wages partial |
| Social Security | EPF + ESI + Gratuity | EPF + ESI | EPF + ESI |
| Contract Labour | CLRA 1970 | CLRA 1970 | CLRA 1970 |
| Inter-state migrant | ISMW Act 1979 | ISMW Act 1979 | ISMW Act 1979 |
Inspector visit simulator
tabletopOSH&WC / Factories site visit
14 evidence items · 12 ready · 2 gaps (Form 21 acknowledgement chain · ventilation log)
EPFO assessment
9 items · 9 ready
ESIC inspection
8 items · 6 ready · 2 gaps (May challan reconcile · contractor IP card chain)
Exposure estimate
Statutory penalty (low–high)₹40 L – ₹1.6 Cr
Operational risk · 1d stop₹18 L
Customer audit failure prob.~12%
Contract value at risk₹2.4 Cr
Mid-case annual exposure₹1.4 Cr
High-impact gaps
s.2(y) wage definition (≥50% basic)
Largest financial-impact item once Wages Code is operative
FTE gratuity pro-rata (IR Code s.53(2))
Affects provisioning and accruals
Women workers · night shift consent
OSHC s.43 · high audit-failure rate
Appointment letter mandate
Common gap especially for contract / temp workers
Localisation Engine / VAANI Translation & Broadcasting
Localisation Engine · Sarvam-powered · WhatsApp-native · yuniTalk-secured
Compose once, localise, broadcast — and prove it
Translation and broadcasting are one workflow: compose a message like an email, VAANI localises it — text and voice — into two Indian languages, and it goes out over WhatsApp with acknowledgement tracking. Target a department, a zone, the entire location, or any combination.
→
→
To
Languages
Pick exactly two Indian languages — each worker is delivered text and voice in their own.
Subject
Template
Pick a ready template, pull a Knowledge Center document, or ask the assistant to draft one.
Resolved recipients
—
| Worker | Role · zone | Type | Language |
|---|
ACK escalation: T+4h WhatsApp reminder · T+8h supervisor flag · T+24h HR escalation. Each broadcast writes one audit entry carrying translation provenance, a content hash, the ACK list and the channel breakdown.
Audience
Channel · this demo
Demo runs on WhatsApp only. Production orchestrates all six channels as fallbacks.
yuniTalk pillars
Leakage controlforwarding off
Data securityE2E + audit
Data residencyIndia
Remote wipe readyenabled
Recipients
5
demo group · WhatsApp
Languages
2
—
Delivered
0/5
not sent yet
Acknowledged
0/5
awaiting send
Live broadcast · —
Each worker's row shows their own language, delivery and acknowledgement
Message preview
Audit entry
Statusnot sent
Content hash—
ChannelWhatsApp
Languages—
ProvenanceVAANI · Mayura v1
Localisation Engine / Transport Schedule
Localisation Engine · weekly worker transport plan
The weekly transport schedule — routes, pickups, two shifts
A published weekly plan for the worker bus fleet — five buses across five zone routes, serving the morning and general shifts. Each route lists its pickup points and timings. Publish the plan, then push it to workers as a localised broadcast in one click.
Buses in service
5
one per zone route
Shifts covered
2
morning · general
Pickup points
—
across all routes
Plan status
Published
—
Weekly plan
Which bus runs which route, by day
Route details & pickup points
Every route, its bus, pickup stops and shift timings
Localisation Engine / Knowledge Center
Localisation Engine · factory-floor readiness
A Knowledge Center for the shop floor
Unified learning modules, OHS guidelines, and role-specific qualifications — authored once by the customer, localised by VAANI, delivered via WhatsApp or in-app, and tracked at module, section, and quiz-question level with evidence-grade certificates.
Active tracks
11
6 direct · 5 contract
Inductions · 30d
142
94 contract · 48 direct
Avg completion time
3.4h
target 4h
Certificate validity
100%
signed · evidence-grade
Refresher schedule · next 14 days
Paint Shop Zone 3 — zone-specific refresher
Auto-triggered by OHS pattern detection. 38 workers (24 direct · 14 contract). WhatsApp + in-app delivery in TE/HI/EN.
Compressor Line · 6-monthly
142 workers · scheduled 28 May 14:00–16:00 across shifts
Hot work permit · annual
22 authorised holders · scheduled first week of June
Ask the Knowledge Center
Pick a category to browse its documents — each is shown as a card with department, owner, date and available languages. Select a document to load it into the chat, then prompt and expand on it. Queries default to English; every answer can be translated for worker distribution.
VAANI Knowledge Assistant
Ask anything · cite everything
English in · translate any result for workers · audited
Governance / Rule library
Transparent rubric · not an AI black box
Inspect every rule, every time
A structured rule library — statutory rules authored by Karya Vaani, customer policy rules layered on top. Each rule carries source, status, jurisdiction and last-verified date. Bundles are signed and approved before activation.
RL-WAG-2y-001
Pending notification · AP
Wage definition — basic ≥ 50% of total wages
Source · Code on Wages 2019 · s.2(y)
RL-CLRA-003
Operative
ESIC enrolment within 3 days of contractor worker joining
Source · ESI Act 1948 · enforcement note from EPFO advisory 2023
RL-OSH-43-001
Pending notification · AP
Women workers · night shift consent, transport & return safety
Source · OSH&WC Code 2020 · s.43
RL-DK-COC-014
Customer policy
Daikin Supplier Code of Conduct · living wage clause
Source · customer policy · Daikin Global Supplier CoC 2024 §6.2
RL-IRC-53-002
Pending notification · AP
FTE gratuity pro-rata under IR Code
Source · IR Code 2020 · s.53(2)
Pending rule bundle
Bundle IDv2026.05.3
SourceKarya Vaani SaaS
Signed bypv-rule-signer-prod
New rules3
Updated rules7
Gazette refsAP 12 May · TN 8 May
Logged to audit trail with your identity
Where AI helps · honestly
ML is used in four bounded places: NLP-based gazette monitoring, document extraction at onboarding, inspector-letter triage, and contractor data anomaly detection. The scoring rubric itself is hand-tuned and inspectable.
Governance / Global Localization Engine
Dedicated Japanese + multi-lingual deployment · gated publishing
No 日本語 reaches an exec without sign-off
Purpose-built engine for Japanese-led customers and multi-state Indian deployment. Non-native-language artefacts (executive summaries, statutory notices, safety briefings) route to the customer's appointed language expert for inline edit, terminology capture and approval. Reviewer identity and timestamp are written to the audit trail; content is then locked for distribution.
Awaiting review
4
Japanese · executive bound
Approved · 30d
38
Daikin · Sato-san
Terminology entries
214
DK glossary v2026.04
Avg review turnaround
3.2h
SLA · 8h
Review queue
Reviewer · Sato-san · Daikin Japan| Artefact | Audience | Source | Status | Glossary | Submitted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 OHS exec summary (四半期OHS要旨) | Daikin Japan HQ | EN → JP | Awaiting review | DK-2026.04 | 2h ago |
| Offer letter · Plant Manager | Candidate · Sato-san | EN → JP | Awaiting review | DK-2026.04 | 4h ago |
| Compressor zone safety briefing | Visiting JP managers | EN → JP | Awaiting review | DK-2026.04 | 5h ago |
| Kaizen observation · visitor input | Plant EHS | JP → EN | Awaiting review | DK-2026.04 | 1h ago |
| 90-day roadmap (board pack) | Daikin Japan HQ | EN → JP | Approved | DK-2026.04 | 1d ago |
Reviewer interface · Q1 OHS exec summary
Awaiting reviewSource (English)
In Q1, the plant logged 1 minor injury and 17 near-misses. The Paint Shop accounts for 5 of those near-misses, concentrated in the afternoon shift. CAPA closure rate is 78%, on target.
Draft Japanese VAANI draft
第一四半期、工場では軽傷1件およびヒヤリハット17件が記録されました。塗装工場ではこのうち5件が午後シフトに集中しています。CAPA完了率は78%で目標を達成しています。
Terminology suggestions · 「ヒヤリハット」 (near-miss), 「軽傷」 (minor injury) added to glossary
Cultural format conventions
Date formatYYYY年MM月DD日
Name orderlast-first (Sato Hiroshi)
Register · executive敬語 (keigo)
Register · operationalplain
Hierarchy presentationparent-line first
Governance / Audit trail
Append-only · SHA-256 chained · WORM
The evidence of record
Every action on the platform — translation, broadcast, ack, document upload, rule activation — is captured as an immutable, chained entry. Retained per statutory floor on your remediation platform; Karya Vaani SaaS does not store it.
Entries (lifetime)
128k
since 14 Jan 2026
Chain integrity
100%
last verified 09:18 today
Retention policy
7y+
statutory floor enforced
Inspector sessions
2
time-bounded · PII-scoped
Recent entries
Export · range
| Time (IST) | Event | Actor | Provenance | Hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14:02:11 | broadcast.sent | Priya M. (CHRO) | MSG-87412 · Mayura v1 · Bulbul v3 · DK-2026.04 | a3f7…d290 |
| 14:02:09 | broadcast.approved | Priya M. (CHRO) | approval chain · 1 step | a3f7…c812 |
| 11:47:02 | contractor.licence.expiring | system | Sri Lakshmi · CLRA · 21d | b9e1…44ac |
| 11:43:18 | localisation.review.approved | Sato-san (Daikin JP) | 90-day roadmap board pack · JP | d104…8821 |
| 09:18:55 | rules.bundle.activated | Rakesh K. (IT Admin) | v2026.05.2 · pv-rule-signer-prod | 7c22…1f08 |
| 08:32:04 | handoff.event.delivered | system | worker.master · HRIS · ack 24s | 52aa…0b41 |
| 17:42:30 (-1d) | contractor.esic.mismatch | system | Sri Lakshmi · −4 May challan | 10ed…ab44 |
Typical entry · what it captures
Event ID + typeMSG-87412
Actor identityPriya M. (CHRO)
Approval chain1 step
Translation provenanceMayura + Bulbul
Reviewer (if any)—
Channels + audience5 · 2087
Content hasha3f7…d290
Prev-hash linka3f7…c812
Inspector mode
Time-bounded, read-only access for a third party (inspector, auditor, parent-company reviewer). PII is scoped to the inspection's stated scope; the inspector's session is itself audited.
Governance / API handoff
Event-driven · mTLS + HMAC-SHA256 · idempotent
Where intake formally ends
On successful onboarding, the worker master record pushes to Daikin HRIS, EHS and payroll over signed webhooks. Ongoing events (incidents, ack records, licence states) keep flowing in near-real time. Customer-side reconciliation endpoint available on demand.
Events · 24h
1,842
p95 delivery 24s
Delivery success
99.92%
2 in DLQ · resolved
Schema conformance
100%
non-conform blocked at gateway
Active endpoints
7
HRIS · EHS · Payroll · IdP · …
Endpoint health · Daikin IT
| Endpoint | System | p95 | Last delivery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /workers/master | Workday HRIS | 24s | 32 min ago | healthy |
| /training/certificates | Workday HRIS | 18s | 1h ago | healthy |
| /ohs/incidents | Daikin EHS | 22s | 4h ago | healthy |
| /contractors/state | Daikin EHS | 26s | 11h ago | healthy |
| /payroll/master | SAP Payroll | 29s | 2h ago | retry · 1 |
| /positions/closed | Workday HRIS | 20s | 3h ago | healthy |
| /reconcile | Daikin IT (on-demand) | — | 1d ago | pull |
Recent payload · /workers/master
{
"event_id": "evt_8f4c…",
"event_type": "worker.onboarded",
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"occurred_at": "2026-05-20T08:32:04Z",
"worker": {
"id": "wrk_010823",
"worker_type": "direct",
"position_id": "POS-2026-0148",
"statutory_ids": { "uan": "…", "esic": null, "pan": "…" },
"documents": [ { "type": "aadhaar", "hash": "…", "ts": "…" } ],
"training": { "certificates": [ "cert_77a1" ] }
},
"signature": "hmac-sha256:…"
}
Retry & reconciliation contract
Retry policyexp · 24h
Idempotency keyevent_id
DLQ alertingSRE pager
Reconciliation endpoint/reconcile
Schema evolutionbackward-compat